Time Management and Prioritizing
| The Rationale
Peter Drucker reminds us
that, just as management is an organization's most critical resource, so
is time the vital resource of managers. However, unlike other resources,
time is inelastic. It is the one commodity that can't be stored -
laid up in advance, held in reserve supply, put aside for a "rainy day."
Effective managers are constantly aware of how well they are man-aging
their time. During the day they repeatedly ask themselves such questions
as: Am I making the most of my time? Should someone else be doing
what I am now doing? Are there things I'm doing that shouldn't be
done at all? Are there better ways of doing what must be done?
Am I working with freshness, or have I reached the point of diminishing
returns?
Many managers are "workaholics"
who see time management as a means of getting more work done per unit of
time. But our approach to time management is concerned with time
effectiveness, not efficiency. Hence, this module focuses on the
concepts and skills that successful managers apply daily in managing their
time effectively. As a result, managers return to work with a plan
for making time their servant rather than their master.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able;
• to identify the major time
wasters common to most organizations;
• to assess their own assumptions
about time management;
• to show how our assumptions
about time affect our ability to manage it;
• to list twelve principles
of time management;
• to differentiate between
time invested and time spent;
• to describe how to log
and analyze the use of time.
Performance Criteria In the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to prepare a daily "to
do" list, ranking each activity according to priority;
• to apply techniques for
controlling our time on the telephone;
• to apply six methods
for making sure that time in meetings is used effectively;
• to reduce the number and
length of unscheduled, disruptive visits;
• to analyze a weekly time
log and take appropriate actions;
• to apply twelve principles
of time management in day-to-day work settings.
RETURN
|
Setting Goals and Standards
| The Rationale
Organizations are concerned
with achieving corporate goals through management by objectives (MBO).
Employees are concerned with making a meaningful contribution, having a
say in decisions affecting their work, being committed to more than a job
and a paycheck ... in short, improving the quality of work life (OWL).
The process that addresses both sets of concerns is one that involves the
joint setting of goals and standards. In most organizations, this
is done at the upper levels of management. But all too often employees
and their supervisors have not been integrated into the process.
This module teaches goal setting as a tool of organizational and personal
revitalization to obtain commitment and growth at all levels.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to state advantages and
pitfalls in involving employees in goal setting;
• to identify their own
attitudes on ten aspects of goal setting;
• to relate the need for
challenge and security to goal setting;
• to define and illustrate
by examples: objectives, goals, standards, quotas;
• to distinguish between
wishes, activities, and goals;
• to assess the strength
of each of ten barriers that cause resistance;
• to edit MBO statements
to meet ten criteria of effective goal setting;
• to define the two roles
of management: entrepreneur and steward.
Performance Criteria in the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to recognize poorly defined
goals and rework them when possible;
• to involve their work
group in the setting of goals affecting their work;
• to develop standards to
give meaning (visibility, reward) to routine jobs;
• to analyze two aspects
for their job: entrepreneurial and stewardship;
• to deal effectively with
resistance to goal setting from employees;
• to identify the activities
and resources needed to achieve a goal;
• to negotiate the value
of different goals and thus establish priorities;
• to prepare MBO documents
and develop other employees to do so also.
RETURN
|
Planning and Scheduling
Work
| The Rationale
In a classic article printed
in the July-August 1975 issue of the Harvard Business Review, Henry Mintzberg
describes the discrepancy between the textbook view of management and the
way managers actually spend their time. Titled "The Manager's Job:
Folklore and Fact," the article points out that managers pay lip service
to planning, scheduling, directing, and con-trolling but spend their time
at an unrelenting pace juggling activities that are characterized by brevity,
variety, and discontinuity.
The studies by Peters and
Waterman more recently support Mintzberg's description of effective executives
as strongly oriented to action with a dislike of reflective activities.
On the average, managers shift activities every eight minutes. While
relatively little time is spent planning and scheduling, it is essential
that this time be quality time - quiet, uninterrupted, Reflective time.
In this module, we strengthen the skills and impart the techniques for planning, scheduling, and organizing work.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend the
workshop will be able:
• to identify the major factors
contributing to resistance to change;
• to describe at least five
ways to manage change and deal with negative attitudes;
• to illustrate each stage
of the management cycle with personal examples;
• to list the characteristics
of goal-oriented and activity-oriented employees;
• to evaluate the feasibility
of action plans against the goals they should achieve;
• to describe the procedure
for preparing a Gantt chart and a PERT network;
• to identify the six work
elements and the process of work simplification;
• to designate which planning
techniques are appropriate for repetitive vs. one-time operations.
Performance Criteria in the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to cultivate commitment
by involving employees appropriately in the planning process;
• to apply the four-stage
management cycle to projects and daily routines;
• to supervise people based
on how goal-oriented vs. activity-oriented they are;
• to use PERT to calculate
the critical path and control time or costs;
• to factor one's time or
cost estimates, based on the normal distribution curve;
• to prepare a Gantt chart
to plan, schedule, and control a project;
• to analyze the present
flow of work, using the six work elements;
• to apply work simplification
techniques to repetitive tasks (work smarter, not harder).
RETURN
|
Listening and Organizing
| The Rationale
Within the past few decades
we have moved from an industrial age to an information age. One of
the major functions of employees at all levels (from mailroom to boardroom)
is to process information. Although much of this information is printed
as hard copy (ink) or soft copy (CRT), most managers get the majority of
their information via the spoken word. And this means listening.
This workshop addresses the
two types of listening we must practice: active and passive. Most
of our listening at work is active... we can interact with the speaker,
asking questions, summarizing, restating, clarifying, giving confirming
feedback, and so on. But sometimes we cannot interact (e.g., with
a radio or TV presentation, in a meeting - where we are a silent observer).
Here our role is more passive, although our mind may be every bit as active
as when we can interact with the speaker.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend
this workshop will be able:
• to identify six guidelines
to listening analytically;
• to distinguish between
fact and opinion;
• to illustrate listening
barriers with examples: emotional, semantic, physical;
• to convert loaded statements
to their neutral equivalents;
• to use the communication
model to show sources of distortion of meaning;
• to assess their comprehension
and retention on a 100-point scale;
• to describe eight things
speakers can do to help their listeners.
Performance Criteria in the
Workplace
Participants who attend
this workshop will be able:
• to listen for intent (action,
purpose) as well as content;
• to give the speaker feedback
(questions, summaries) to confirm understanding;
• to evaluate messages by
filtering out bias (opinion, emotion, etc.);
• to organize complex messages
for retention;
• to recognize gaps, omissions,
inconsistencies, etc., and work for closure;
• to eliminate barriers
relating to source, medium, and destination;
• to apply the six guidelines
of effective listening.
RETURN
|
Giving Clear Information
| The Rationale
In the world of work, managers
and supervisors are expected to communicate clearly, concisely, completely,
crisply, convincingly, and courteously. Thoughts and information
should flow logically and smoothly toward the accomplishment of each message's
purpose. Unfortunately, the free flow of thought from the human brain
is rarely this well organized. Often we regret things we said or
did not say ... things that interfered with our objective. Most of
us need time to outline a message, whether written or spoken, before we
begin to deliver it ... we need time to "load brain before firing mouth."
In this module, we look at the process of giving information as a carefully
planned sequence that moves both parties toward a desired outcome.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to recognize when comments
are and are not relevant to Alm;
• to know when to exert
high and low Bias in a message;
• to identify factors that
help or hinder a positive Climate in our communications;
• to follow a three-step
process for planning an interaction;
• to use a checklist for
giving information effectively;
• to organize information
into a concise, crisp, compelling message.
Performance Criteria in the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to apply the ABC's in interpersonal
communications;
• to analyze and edit a
script of an interview;
• to plan an interaction,
following a three-step process;
• to prepare a script to
show the giving and getting of information;
• to organize a written
message effectively (combining, sequencing, etc.);
• to evaluate one's communication
skills against twelve criteria;
• to rewrite a message to
accomplish its objective.
RETURN
|
Getting Unbiased Information
| The Rationale
Managers and supervisors
tend to be far more adept at asking highly structured, direct questions
than indirect, open-ended ones. This is appropriate for obtaining
certain kinds of information. At other times, such an approach will
bias the other party to say what is expected or expedient or pleasing.
No wonder the information managers obtain is often slanted or filtered
or incomplete or whitewashed or dated or otherwise misleading. Since
the quality of decisions made, problems solved, and actions taken depends
on getting clean, unvarnished information as input, it is essential that
managers learn to be equally adept at direct and non-direct questioning
techniques, and to recognize bias and correct for it in our daily communications.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to define the ABC's of
interpersonal communication (Aim, Bias, Climate);
• to give examples of good
and poor control of each;
• to describe the funnel
technique for eliciting information;
• to give one example of
each of the three types of funnel question;
• to illustrate by example
the difference between a response and a reply;
• to identify five common
types of probes and their advantages;
• to edit and rephrase questions
that are poorly worded;
• to use each of the five
probes in a typical interaction.
Performance Criteria in the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to recognize inadequate
responses and probe for needed information;
• to manage the ABC's so
as to steer an interaction to its desired outcome;
• to apply the funnel technique
in eliciting personal information;'
• to conduct an effective
selection interview;
• to prepare for fact-finding
sessions (problem solving, counseling, etc.);
• to recognize ineffective
questions and rephrase them;
• to improve the quality
of interpersonal communication in their work group;
• to use non-directive techniques
to elicit hard-to-get information.
RETURN
|
Training, Coaching
and Delegating
| The Rationale
The quality of work that
you personally perform is important to achieving the daily, weekly, and
monthly expectations of your manager and your unit. However, taking
a broader perspective (as measured in years), the best measure of a manager's
contribution to the organization is in the quality of that manager's team
... how well people know their jobs and perform them, how challenged they
are by new assignments, and how effectively the team members work together.
Training, coaching, and delegating are the tools a manager has to build
the team and to achieve high productivity on both the personal and the
group level.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to describe via example
the ten principles of training;
• to identify and illustrate
three components of behavior (K-A-S);
• to evaluate their own
effectiveness as a trainer;
• to identify at least six
benefits of delegating;
• to assess their own personal
barriers to effective delegation;
• to describe four techniques
for improving the delegation process;
• to evaluate any delegation
session against 15 criteria.
Performance Criteria In the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to follow a six-step procedure
in planning a training session;
• to use a four-page Training
Planning Sheet to accomplish the above;
• to break large chunks
of information (S) into interactive bits (S-R-F);
• to organize short training
sessions according to the S-R-F ("micro") model;
• to apply the Acquisition-Demonstration-Application
("macro") model;
• to overcome barriers to
delegating some tasks they now perform;
• to follow an eight-step
procedure in planning a delegating session;
• to use a four-page Delegation
Planning Sheet to accomplish the above.
RETURN
|
Appraising People
and Performance
| The Rationale
Jan's reaction to being told
that it's time for her annual performance review is typical: "I'll just
be glad to get it over with." Unfortunately, most employees do not look
forward to being appraised. The reasons are many, but can be overcome
by following a number of guidelines: appraisals must be frequent, informal,
surprise-free, prepared for by both parties, conducted as a dialog and
not a one-sided assessment, and focused on behavior (performance) and not
on personality or character traits. This module imparts the concepts
and skills needed to make the appraisal process a year-round flow of feedback
and not an annual day of judgment.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to assess their own assumptions
and expectations regarding performance appraisals;
• to describe the criteria
of an effective job description;
• to identify the benefits
of having employees evaluate their own performance;
• to list the steps in conducting
a constructive performance appraisal;
• to describe at least six
guidelines for giving employees feedback on the job;
• to evaluate the organization's
present system for appraising performance;
• to distinguish between
performance and personality statements;
• to translate critical
statements into constructive feedback.
Performance Criteria in the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to prepare themselves and
their subordinates for a constructive appraisal;
• to use feedback as a daily
tool to shape and reinforce behavior;
• to elicit self-evaluations
from subordinates;
• to use descriptive rather
than evaluative comments when appraising;
• to conduct appraisals
that meet the guidelines noted above (first paragraph);
• to prepare an action plan
for a subordinate's development;
• to update job descriptions
where needed to be accurate and complete.
RETURN
|
Disciplining and
Counseling
| The Rationale
It would be an ideal world
(and a naive expectation of managers) to have all employees arrive at work
on time every day, with a positive attitude, a strong willingness to work,
and a commitment to earn their keep. Unfortunately, in the real world
of work, there are always some employees who are undisciplined or incompetent
or committed to getting the most and giving the least. This happens
despite our best efforts in selecting and training employees. Hence,
it is sometimes necessary for a supervisor or manager to impose discipline
when performance standards have not been met. This module deals with
how to counsel and discipline employees in a positive, constructive manner.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to define 15 guidelines
for conducting effective counseling sessions;
• to distinguish between
coaching, counseling, and disciplining;
• to describe how "positive
discipline" differs from traditional discipline;
• to identify the major
steps involved in the practice of positive discipline;
• to describe why asking
questions is preferable to giving advice when counseling;
• to identify three steps
to the planning of any interpersonal communication.
Performance Criteria In the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to describe the employee's
deviant behavior and the desired new behavior;
• to specify the likely
causes of the behavior to be changed;
• to develop a plan of action
to get rid of the undesirable behavior;
• to apply a six-step disciplinary
strategy for restoring performance;
• to use the "Discipline
Planning Sheet" to apply the six-stage strategy;
• to apply a ten-step planning
process in preparing for a counseling session;
• to use the four-page "Coaching
and Counseling Planning Sheet";
• to counsel/discipline
employees in a way that improves their performance;
• to establish ways to monitor
and maintain performance over time.
RETURN
|
Identifying and Solving
Problems
| The Rationale
Managers are expected to
solve problems promptly and wisely, based on the best available evidence.
Unfortunately, most supervisors and managers have never been taught skills
associated with problem solving: how to set measurable objectives, collect
and evaluate information, separate fact from opinion, identify the problems
they face, state and test action plans, and consider alternative steps
to solve their problems. Successful supervisors and managers, regardless
of the type of organization, possess these skills.
Fortunately, they can be
taught. This module is designed to impart the skills for applying
a problem-solving process that will markedly improve managers' ability
to identify and systematically eliminate or reduce the barriers that stand
between them and their objectives. The course emphasizes analytical
skills development, rather than how to follow a simplistic formula or rigid
procedure. This leads to a more positive attitude toward problem
solving as managers apply their new cognitive skills.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to identify an eight-step
process for identifying and solving problems;
• to describe the value
of training subordinates in the skills of problem solving;
• to define: problem, symptom,
cause, deviation, evidence, solution;
• to evaluate action plans
for correcting a specific printing problem;
• to examine five options
for dealing with a problem;
• to describe the two "Acid
Tests" that any plan of action must meet.
Performance Criteria In the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to state the objectives
that are not being met, thus verifying a problem;
• to revise or edit objectives
so as to meet five criteria;
• to distinguish between
problems/symptoms, and hard/soft evidence;
• to evolve plans for action
that include the "how" as well as the "what";
• to test the plan of action
against the criteria of Acid Tests One and Two;
• to evaluate and select
the action plan with the best cost/benefit ratio;
• to evaluate one's action
plan during implementation, fine-tuning as needed;
• to apply the eight-step
problem-solving process at work and at home.
RETURN
|
Making Decisions, Weighing
Risk
| The Rationale
At work our day is filled
with decisions. Some are relatively automatic and involve little
or no risk. We make hundreds of these decisions every week.
This course does not deal with such decisions. Rather our concern
is with decisions whose outcomes have more at stake and whose inputs are
more complex... many factors must be weighed. Such decisions require
care in specifying the desired outcomes, determining criteria, selecting
and evaluating alternatives, assessing risk, and drawing up an implementation
plan. In short, this module teaches the process of preparing a decision
matrix and using it to make the best selection(s), while reducing risk
and fear of failure.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to distinguish between
problem solving and decision making;
• to define four terms whose
meaning is central to the decision-making process;
• to identify a ten-step
decision-making process;
• to identify four types
of decisions and compare them on two variables;
• to distinguish between
limits, desirables, and options;
• to prepare and complete
a decision matrix.
Performance Criteria In the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to define the situation
that led up to and now requires a decision;
• to state the objective
of a de6ision in a manner that meets the criteria taught;
• to specify the criteria
that will influence the selection of options;
• to generate options by
selecting from existing alternatives or creating new ones;
• to assign weights to the
options identified;
• to perform a risk analysis
and apply it to the final making of the decision;
• to implement the decision
and monitor the results;
• to apply the ten-step
decision-making process in a variety of situations.
RETURN
|
Thinking Clearly and
Analytically
| The Rationale
If we were to reduce all
the activities of managing people and tasks to their most basic underlying
competencies, we might be left with two: communicating and thinking.
And an argument could be made to define communication as "shared thought"
or as "thinking out loud." In short, the ability to think clearly and analytically
is one that managers are drawing upon every minute of the day.
It seems surprising, then,
that we have not had required courses in public schools and colleges on
how to think. Some aspects of analytical thinking are dealt with
in courses on experimental design, statistics, English composition, logic,
and so on, but the subject has been largely neglected in schools and in
management development programs. This workshop represents a bold departure from the traditional curriculum of such programs.
Learning Objectives for the
Workshop
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to assess their own thinking
(left/right brain, inductive/deductive);
• to describe three ways
to solve problems, with pros and cons of each;
• to break down propositions
into premises, arguments, and conclusions;
• to test for the validity
of each part of a logical proposition;
• to define inductive and
deductive argument with examples of each;
• to identify three major
barriers to effective reasoning;
• to list at least four
ways of improving the quality of thinking at work;
• to analyze ten propositions
(MAP situations) for their logic;
• to evaluate the assumptions
they've made about thinking and intelligence.
Performance Criteria in the
Workplace
Participants who attend this
workshop will be able:
• to apply a 12-item checklist
to their own thinking on major activities;
• to recognize personal
bias (left/right brain) and compensate for it;
• to use inductive and deductive
thought processes appropriately;
• to identify and correct
fallacious arguments and faulty logic;
• to withhold opinions until
the facts are collected and evaluated;
• to analyze how others
think and draw on this to supplement one's own style;
• to generate lists of advantages/disadvantages
before taking a stand;
• to apply the process of
analytical thinking taught in this module.
RETURN
|
|